THE
TABLE OF
NATIONS
(GENEALOGY
OF MANKIND)
AND
THE
ORIGIN OF
RACES
(HISTORY
OF MAN)
The history of the races of mankind is a fascinating subject. Biologically, a race is generally thought of as a variety, or subspecies, within a given species. All the races are a part of the human race. We have made the term race to apply to skin color, but the dictionary defines race as "a class or kind of individuals with common characteristics, interests, appearances, or habits as if derived from a common ancestor."
Where did we come from? The answers have always been with us, as presented in the original Table of Nations. What you are about to read can best be described as an Exegesis (from the Greek exégesis, verb: exégetikos, meaning interpretation, guide, translation or critical exposition). Once you have read what is presented here, you may not view any race of people the same way again. Note that there is nothing like the Table of Nations (as presented here) in any other national tradition. Here we are presented the origin of nations.
The fact is, that wherever its statements can be sufficiently tested, Genesis 10 of the Bible has been found completely accurate; resulting partly from linguistic studies, partly from archaeology, and, more recently still, from the findings of physical anthropologists, who are, to this day, recovering important clues to lines of migration in ancient historic times. As implied in verse 32 of Genesis 10, this Table includes everybody; meaning that so-called fossil man, primitive peoples (ancient and modern) and modern man are all derived from Noah's three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Acts 17:26 states, "From one man (or one blood) He made every nation of men, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and He determined the times set for them and the exact places where they should live," a corroboration of Genesis 10. In light of this, findings from anthropology, archaeology, ethnography, ethnohistory, genetics, geology, and sociology substantiate an alternate interpretation of the history of humanity. As one archaeologist, William Albright, noted "it [the Bible] remains an astonishingly accurate document...and shows such remarkably 'modern' understanding of the ethnic and linguistic situation in the modern world, in spite of all its complexity, that scholars never fail to be impressed with it's knowledge of the subject." We can further infer from political histories-kingdoms, empires, and their rulers; also from artists, poets, philosophers, architects and mathematicians who enriched their individual cultures. Additionally, references from historical records, ancient literature, mythology, burial customs and other sources all provide strong evidences.
This may seem a gross over-simplification,
and even appear to oppose well-established secular scientific opinion;
however, science has proven itself over and over to be a double-edged sword.
For example, it is often found that what is obviously true, is actually
false. The obvious idea that the sun moved around the earth was
erroneous, but until that view was corrected, little progress was made
in the science of astronomy. On the other hand, on occasion, what
is obviously false turns out to be actually true, as in the
scientific belief that dinosaurs and humans never coexisted. That
changed when fossilized footprints of dinosaurs and humans were found together,
with the most recent fossil discovery showing a human footprint slightly
overlapped by a dinosaur footprint. Newly discovered art work and
various ancient artifacts depicting live dinosaurs by themselves, or interacting
with humans, gave further proof. These include burial stones, burial
cloths, clay figurines and cave drawings. While scientific knowledge
is characterized by a progressive approach to reality, it has often proved
detrimental to the progress of understanding in the things which it has
denied. Such is the case here. So before you begin to judge,
please continue reading.
As stated earlier, race does not apply to skin color alone. Skin color is essentially the only biological difference in race, and science has been unable to determine what causes skin pigmentation. They have not been able to define the difference in cell pigment or structure. This superficial distinction is the basis for the division of mankind, but the fact is, we are all the same color, and some people have a little more "color" than others. Skin shade is due to the amount of a substance called melanin in the skin; the more melanin, the darker the skin. We are not born with a genetically fixed amount of melanin, but rather with a genetically fixed potential to produce a certain amount, increasing in response to sunlight (why Caucasians "tan" when exposed to the sun for long periods). Racially mixed individuals can have children with skin color that is very dark, very light, or anywhere in between. The predominant shade for freely interbreeding individuals would be brown.
As family groups became isolated by language barriers, environmental factors allowed particular traits already present to be expressed more frequently. Noah's family suggests a "racially mixed" population with biological potential for variation. The Biblical viewpoint is that there is not a black race, white race, yellow race, etc. Instead, there are three distinct families or characteristics of man that make up the oldest Table of Nations in existence, which is a completely authentic statement of how the present world population originated and spread after the flood, as recorded in Genesis 10 of the Bible (a historical document itself). Here we learn the true divisions of mankind, indicating how the present population of the world came to be. The listing of Noah's descendants is more theological than hereditary, so we must understand that Noah's descendants existed because of his righteousness.
Modern genetics shows that when a large, freely interbreeding group is suddenly broken into many smaller groups which from then on breed only among themselves (as the Biblical description of the language dispersion at Babel would imply), different racial characteristics will arise very rapidly. It can be shown that one pair of middle-brown parents could produce all known shades of color, from very white to very black, in one generation. The racial characteristics which exist today have not evolved, and generally speaking, are simply different combinations of pre-existing (created) genetic (hereditary) information. Remee and Kian Hodgson born April 2005, and Layton and Kaydon Richardson born July 2006 (pictured below) are fraternal "black and white" twins. More incredible was the birth of two sets of mixed-race twins by Alison and Dean Durrant. Their first twins were born in 2001, and their second twins arrived November 2008 (all pictured below). Other fraternal twin births include Alicia and Jasmin Singerl born May 2006, and Ryan and Leo Gerth born July 2008 (not picutred), all providing proof of such genetic detail. The environment plays a secondary role in favoring certain combinations over others.
Hodgson Twins Richardson Twins Durrant Twins (times two)
Genesis chapter 10 describes how the
present world population was derived from Noah's three sons: Shem,
Ham and Japheth, and their wives (three family groups). Verse 32 states,
"From these the nations spread out over the earth after the flood." Additional
references are given in 1 Chronicles chapter 1. Genesis 10 exactly names
16 grandsons of Noah, and then we are provided further details of the Babel dispersion (Genesis 11)
where their descendants fanned out over the earth and established the various nations
of the ancient world. The number of descendants of Noah (grandsons, great-grandsons, etc.)
mentioned are 26 from Shem, 30 from Ham, and 14 from Japheth, totaling 70 "sons" or "nations."
These 70 nations are the descendants (generations, genealogies or family histories) of the
sons of Noah, known from Hebrew antiquity (Talmudic tradition of seventy nations in the world),
and other ancient sources.
Most, if not all, tribes and nations can be traced to
these men through their descendants. Chapter 10 describes the differentiation of
nations, and asserts that we were all descended from Noah. It is important to understand
that people and nations are referred to in a genealogical form (common in Hebrew and other
Semitic languages). We find genealogical references in Genesis 10
are firstly to persons or families (ethnological), and secondly
to nations or tribes (ethnographical); thus, the chapter ends with an emphasis
on nations or tribes, which helps us understand in following chapters where
they settled or "spread out over the earth" (geographical). We must
acknowledge the early reality of inter-family marrying as individual family
groups were established. This would later define skin color and other
unique features within various subgroups and their subsequent populations.
They began as hunter-gatherers and/or pastoral nomads (living off the land
as they migrated).
Evidence shows that Noah's sons kept together at first, then broke up into small groups and eventually arrived from the east in the southern Mesopotamian Plain (Gen. 11:2). The descendants of Elam, the first born son of Shem, were the first people to enter Mesopotamia. Susa, the capital city of the Elamites (Shemitic Elamites), gave rise to other early cities, such as Al-Ubaid (which later gave rise to Hamitic settlements—including the Sumerian civilization) and Jemdet Nasr. Recent excavations have provided very strong evidence of direct cultural links between some of the earliest cities in Babylonia and the lowest layers uncovered at Susa. These people established themselves first in the south and gradually spread toward the north, but without losing the cultural links. There are no known modern descendants of the Elamites. Other excavations have shown that one of the first Hamitic groups, the Sumerians, gave rise to considerable cultural advance and power in that region. Other people groups known very early included the Japhethites, noted especially for their fairness of skin, in the hill country east of the Tigris. Soon the great tower of Babel arose.
Further evidence indicates that the rulers of the City of Babel attempted to avert dispersal of the people by proposing the building of a monument as a visible rallying point on the flat plain of Mesopotamia. Scripture and historical texts note that the tower of Babel, the building of which Nimrod (a Sumerian) supervised, was to have two great significances. The city of Babel would become the metropolis of the world and unite its inhabitants under the dictatorial rule of Nimrod. The tower was to be a monument to man to stand as a symbol of Babel. Given the present knowledge of Babel history, Genesis 11 has a solid historical foundation in early Mesopotamia. Nimrod hoped to prevent the people from scattering abroad into colonies as God intended, thus bringing upon themselves a judgment which led to confusion of the languages and rapid scattering throughout the earth. Babel means confusion. Urbanization, as attested by archaeological records, did not occur until after the dispersal of languages. The history of linguistic development and settlement patterns in Mesopotamia support this. There are dozens of unclassified and isolate languages throughout the world, such as Basque, Ainu and Ticuna, which testify to the widespread language distribution at Babel. The name Babel would be preserved as Babylon, a future world empire. We can safely conclude that all people in the world are descended from the inhabitants of Babel, the first civilization after Noah's flood. From there the great empires of the past arose, including Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia and Greece, and all have strong historical links to the sons of Noah.
We can find validation from research
scientists who study human genetics. They claim that lineages derived
from known people groups did in fact appear to have migrated from the "Near
East" or "Middle East" (also called the "Cradle of Civilization" or the "Cradle
of Mankind") sometime during prehistory. This information is derived from
DNA haplogroups. Haplogroups are used in DNA tests
for markers that give a broad or regional picture; haplotypes are one person's
results on various DNA tests. Data comes from either Y-chromosome
(Y-DNA) passed down from a father, or mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) passed
down from a mother. Both can be used to define genetic populations
from one generation to the next intact. Here we attest there was a
first pair, Adam and Eve. Scientists have traced the mitochondrial DNA
in all living humans back to a single female, and similarly, genetic markers
in all males in the world today can be traced back to a single male.
Y-chromosome Adam and mitochondrial Eve are connected to everyone now living
by an unbroken father-to-son or mother-to-daughter line (including everyone else in their generations
who's ancestors are connected through one or more father-to-daughter or mother-to-son links).
Haplogroup classifications are based on identification of genetic markers which a population
of individuals share, passed down from an ancient but common ancestor. These genetic markers
are evolving as new markers are found, sometimes resulting from occasional mutations to DNA.
Different populations carry distinct markers. Examples of these markers can be seen
in the charts below:
![]() |
![]() |
Notice in the images below that the
genetic lineages originate from "somewhere in the Middle East," or Mesopotamia
as the Bible claims:
![]() |
Migration
Map for Y-Chromosome Haplogroups
from FamilyTreeDNA (click image to enlarge): ![]() |
A majority of scholars and Bible historians agree that most of the descendants of Shem stayed in the Middle East, and Shem's descendants are well documented. These include the Hebrews, Persians and Assyrians. Modern day Arabs and Jews trace their lineage to Shem. Many Arabic nomad tribes still claim they descended from Shem. The descendants of Shem (Shemites) are often called Semites, a term first used in the late 18th century for peoples listed in the Bible as descended from Shem. Today the term Semite refers to peoples who speak any of the Semitic languages, including the ancient peoples who inhabited Babylonia (Mesopotamia). Modern peoples speaking Semitic languages include the Arabs and Jews. Several centuries before the Christian Era, many ancient Semitic populations were migrating in large numbers from Arabia to Mesopotamia, the coasts of the Mediterranean Sea, and the Nile River delta. Jews and other Semites settled in villages in Judea (southern Palestine). Today, Semitic-speaking peoples are concentrated in the Middle East and northern Africa.
The descendants of Ham include the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Canaanites, Phoenicians and Hittites. His descendants appear to be the first to fill the earth, as they were the early settlers of Africa, Asia, Australia, the South Pacific and the Americas. The descendants of Japheth migrated into Europe and parts of Central Asia. The Greeks, Romans, Spanish, Celts, Scythians and Medes were Japheth's descendants. Some people groups merged to form one nation, as did the Persians (Shem) and the Medes (Japheth), which later became the Medo-Persian empire. We also find that many nations or peoples were named after an ancestor. Romans, and their capital city, were named after Romulus. Israelis and their country are named after their forefather, Israel. The observable fact of attaching the name of a leader to his people and his empire appears often in Ancient Near Eastern history. The Table of Nations in Genesis 10 illustrates this principle, whereby every land was named after its first successful settler: Canaanites were named after Ham's son, Canaan, and so on.
Note that the many names of family groups and nations listed here naturally follow well-established rules in the development of language, and the transfer of words between languages of a different family or nation. Letters may be transposed, endings added, prefixes taken away or added, but the basic root persists to help trace the spread of the peoples of the earth. For example, the ancient city of Unuk (in the Bible is the first city ever built, equated with Enoch), later appears as Uruk and Erech, then as Wark or Warka by the Sumerians, and finally appears in Greek as Purgos or Pergos. The conversion of "wark" into "purg-" shows the transfer of words between languages of a different family (more on language groups at the end of this article).
Interestingly enough, purg-
becomes burgh in modern Indo-European languages, which is the root
of the English word, borough. Several examples of this are
below, specifically in the lines of Japheth. The three sons of Noah
and their descendants listed below are not in any particular order.
From Babel the three families of man would populate the earth, and here
we have the beginnings of all people groups through Shem,
Ham
and Japheth:
Shem. Also Sem. Literal meanings are named or renown (father of the Semitic people groups - Shemites). The sons of Shem were:
(1) Elam "eternity"(sons were Shushan, Machul and Harmon) - (Elamites, Persians);
(2) Asshur "a step" or "strong" (sons were Mirus and Mokil) - (Assyrians/Northern Iraqis);
(3) Arphaxad "I shall fail" (sons were Shelach, Anar and Ashcol) - (Chaldeans/Southern Iraqis, Hebrews/Israelites/Jews1, Arabians/Bedouins, Moabites/Jordanians/Palestinians, and related groups);
(4) Lud "strife" (sons were Pethor and Bizayon) - (Ludim, Lubim, Ludians, Ludu, Lydians, Chubs, other related groups in Asia Minor and North Africa);
(5) Aram "exalted" (sons were Uz, Chul, Gather and Mash) - (Aramaeans/Syrians, Lebanese, other related groups), and remnant groups throughout Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa.
1Hebrews descended from Eber (Heber), a great-grandson of Shem. Six generations after Heber, Abram (Abraham) was born, so Abraham was both a Hebrew and a Semite, born of the line of Heber and Shem. Ishmael and Isaac were born of Abraham. However, Ishmael was born of an unlawful union between Abraham and his Egyptian maid Hagar (Genesis 16, Galatians 4), making Ishmael half Semitic and half Hamitic. Sunnite Arabs (specifically Arabian Muslims) consider themselves to be descendants of Ishmael, often calling themselves Ishmaelites, and thus are both Semitic Hebrews and Hamites. To this day the descendents of Ishmael (Arabs) and his half-brother brother Isaac (Israelites) have fought over which family group is Abraham's true spiritual heir, specifically relating to ownership of land in the Middle East. Thus, there has been an unsolvable problem, and the nation of Israel is progressively being forced to give up land for peace.
Isaac was born to Abraham and his lawful wife Sarah (Gen. 17, 18 & 21). Isaac had twin sons named Esau and Jacob. Esau was firstborn, and so had the right to inheritance (as was custom), but instead sold his birthright to Jacob during a time of hunger. Esau's name was changed to Edom, and Jacob's name was changed to Israel. The descendants of Esau (Edom) became known as Edomites, and the descendants of Jacob (Israel) became known as Israelites. Jacob fathered 12 sons which became the twelve tribes of Israel. Those who interchange the words "Jew" and Israelite, call Abraham a Jew, though Abraham was neither an Israelite or a Jew. The word "Jew" was not used in the Bible until nearly 1,000 years after Abraham. One of Jacob's (Israel's) children was Judah (Hebrew "Yehudah"). His descendants were called Yehudim ("Judahites"). In Greek the name is Ioudaioi ("Judeans"). Most all Bible translations use the word "Jew," which is a modern, shortened form of the word "Judahite." A "Jew" in the Old Testament would be a "Judahite;" and a "Jew" in the New Testament would be a "Judean."
A bitter rivalry between the descendants of Esau and Jacob continued throughout history, and as they lived in close proximity for hundreds of years, their hatred worsened. The Romans referred to the Edomites as Idumeans, separate from Israelites, when they lived in the region of Palestine together. The Romans later divided Palestine into districts, with Idumea (land of Edomites) being one of the districts. As the Roman Empire faded, Idumea was divided again into Northern Idumea, and the region fell to an Ishmaelite (Arabian) Muslim army led by Caliph Umar in 638 A.D. Historians suggest the remaining Edomites embraced Islam at that time and remained in the land, blending with the Arabs, and uniting against the Israelites.
Jerusalem soon became a focal point for the Muslims (Moslems), being the third most holy city of Islam, after the cities of Mecca and Medina (though Jerusalem is never mentioned in the Koran, it is mentioned over 800 times in the Bible). By 691 A.D., the Mosque of Omar (also called the "Dome of the Rock") was completed on the Temple Mount, where Muslims believe Mohammed ascended to heaven from. The Arabic term for the holy place is "al-Haram as-Sharif" meaning "The Noble Sanctuary." To Israelites and Jews, Jerusalem was the city of the great prophets and the capital of the Kingdom of Israel and Judah under King David and his son King Solomon. The first and second temples were the center of worship until the destruction of the city by the Romans in 70 A.D. Christians revere the city as the place where Jesus Christ taught in the temple, and was later crucified. Christians believe that Jesus will return to establish His Kingdom at the Temple Mount with Jerusalem as world capital.
Still confused? Here's a simple patriarchal chart, beginning with Noah, showing how these family groups came to be:
Noah
|
Shem-->Eber-->Terah
|
--------------|----
| | |
Abram Nahor Haran
| |
|----------| Lot
Isaac Ishmael |-------------------
| | | |
|------| |--->Arabs<-----Moab Ammon
Jacob Esau |
| |------->Arabs<----------------
|
Israelites & Jews
Ham.
Also Cham or Kham. Literal meanings are passionate, hot,
burnt or dark (father of the Australoid, Negroid and Mongoloid people
groups - Hamites). He was the progenitor of:
(1) Cush "black" (sons were Seba, Havilah, Sabta, Raama and Satecha) - also Chus, Kush, Kosh, Cushaean (Cushites, Nubians, Ethiopians, Ghanaians, Africans, Bushmen, Pygmies, Australian Aborignies, New Guineans, other related groups);
(2) Mizraim
"double straits" (sons were Lud, Anom, Pathros, Chasloth and Chaphtor)
- also Masr, Misr, Misraim, Mitzraim, Mizraite, Mitsrayim (Egyptians1, Khemets,
Copts, other related groups);
(3) Phut
"a bow" (sons were Gebul, Hadan, Benah and Adan) - also Punt,
Puta, Put, Puni, Phoud, Pul, Fula, Putaya, Putiya, Libia, Libya (Libyans,
Cyrenacians, Tunisians, Berbers, Somalians, Sudanese, North Africans, other
related groups);
(4) Canaan
"down low" (sons were Zidon2,
Heth, Amori, Gergashi, Hivi, Arkee, Seni, Arodi, Zimodi and Chamothi) -
also Canaanites, Cana, Chna, Chanani, Chanana, Canaana, Kana, Kenaanah,
Kena'ani, Kena'an, Kn'nw, Kyn'nw, Kinnahu, Kinahhi, Kinahni, Kinahna, Kinahne
(Mongols, Asians, Orientals, Chinese, Tibetans, Taiwanese, Thais, Vietnamese,
Laotians, Cambodians, Japanese, Eskimos, American Indians3,
Malayasians, Indonesians, Filipinos, Hawaiians, Maoris, Polynesians, Tahitians,
Guamanians, Samoans, Fijians, Tongans, Tokelauans, Tuvaluans, Pacific Islanders4
and related groups5).
Tribes in other
parts of Africa, Arabia and Asia, aboriginal groups in Australia, native
Pacific Islanders, American Indians and Eskimos were birthed from descendants
of Canaan, Cush, Mizraim and Phut.
Looking at
history, whichever region is considered, Africa, Europe, Australia, or
America, the major migrations have always been from Asia. In every
area of the world where Japhethites have subsequently settled, they have
always been preceded by Hamites. This pattern applies in every continent.
In early historic times the circumstance seems always to be true, the earliest
fossil remains of man being Mongoloid or Negroid in character and in head
shape, whereas those that came last belong to the family of Japheth (Caucasoid).
When we study ancient history and technological achievements, which were
in many ways the equal of, or superior of, much that we have today, we
find Hamitic people showed an amazing adaptability to the world in which
they founded, and carried to a high technological proficiency their societies.
Their achievements were exploited by Japhetic and Semitic peoples, who
became great scientific discoverers. The Hamitic migrations indicate
they sought a way of life, not an understanding or a control of nature
beyond what was immediately useful. A majority of Ham's descendants were
not negroid. Genesis 10:15-20 records that of the 32 descendants of Ham,
four settled in unknown places, 23 settled in the Middle East and five settled
in Africa. Archeologists tell us that no groups inhabiting the Middle East
in Biblical times were negroid. Many had brown, red and white racial
characteristics. Ham's descendants appear to be the most varied of Noah's lineage.
Ham's fourth
born son was Canaan. Genesis 10:15-19 identifies a distinctive characteristic
of the sons of Canaan: They liked to spread out. The Canaanites
are specifically mentioned as migrating far and wide, "...and afterward
the families of the Canaanites were spread abroad. The territory
of the Canaanites extended from Sidon as you go toward Gerar, as far as
Gaza; as you go toward Sodom and Gomorrah and Admah and Zeboiim, as far
as Lasha." History indicates they did have a propensity for sprawl.
The descendants of Canaan would later make up the vast populations of Asia,
Africa and the Western Hemisphere.
1Epypt
is one of the most frequently mentioned names in the Bible. Egypt is also synonymous
with Mizraim. For example, Misr (Mizraim) is the Arabic name for Epypt.
The name Egypt is thought to be derived from the name Hout ka-Ptah or Hi-ku-Ptah,
both meaning the "Place of the Spirit of the god Ptah." The name was Hellenized by
the Greeks, rendering Hi-ku-ptah as Ai-gu-ptos (Aiguptos), becoming
the Latin Aegyptus, and later Egypt in modern English. The term Copt is also
believed to be etymologically derived from this name. Hi-ku-Ptah was believed to be located
in the capital city of Memphis. In the Bible, Memphis is called Moph or Noph.
2Zidon
(or Sidon) and his descendants settled on the Mediterranean coast of present-day
Lebanon, then known as the land of Canaan. The Sidonians called themselves
Kena'ani, or Canaanites. Interestingly, the Canaanites spoke a Semitic
language, probably adopted from a large migration of Semites who came from
land and sea, and introduced their language and a sophisticated maritime
technology about 1800 B.C. Historians suggest these Cannaanites succumbed
to racial and linguistic intermixture with the invading Semites, which
led to the loss of their own ethnic predominance, as evidenced by modern
excavations. They eventually moved westward and occupied a very narrow
coastal strip of the east Mediterranean, building new cities, and establishing
significant trade with neighboring nations. In fact, the Israelite
name for "Canaan" came to mean "traders," though some suggest the name
Canaan is from the Hebrew name Hurrian, meaning "land of red purple." The Canaanites
were known for their red and purple cloth (a purple dye was extracted from
murex snails found near the shores of Palestine, a method now lost).
The Greeks called the land of Canaan "Phoenicia," which meant "purple."
The Phoenicians became a nation of great trade, language, and culture.
Phoenician, Hebrew and Moabite were a group of west Semitic languages,
all dialects from Canaan, as referred to in Isaiah 19:18. The writing
system of the Phoenicians is the source of the writing systems of nearly
all of Europe, including Greek, Russian, Hebrew, Arabic and the Roman alphabet.
The Phoenician empire fell under Hellenistic rule after being conquered
by Alexander the Great about 332 B.C. In 64 B.C. the name of Phoenicia
disappeared entirely, becoming a part of the Roman providence of Syria.
At the beginning of the Christian era, remaining Phoenicians were the first
to accept the Christian faith after the Jews. Zidon's name is still
perpetuated in the modern-day city of Sidon (Saidoon is the Phoenician
name, Saida in Arabic) in southern Lebanon.
3Evidence
for diverse migrations into the Americas comes from research on living
American Indian populations, which includes data from Mitochondrial DNA
(mtDNA) that is passed down from a mother to her children from one generation
to the next intact. These studies have consistently shown similarities
(deep ancestry) between American Indians and recent populations in Asia,
Siberia and northern Scandinavia. These groups include the Lapps
in northern Europe/Scandinavia, the Chukchi and Yukaghir in Siberia, plus
Indians and Eskimos/Aleuts throughout Canada and North America. There
is a wealth of information on the genetic relationship between early Taiwanese
populations and southeast Asian, Oceanic (South Pacific) and Native American
descendants. Ancient American Indian skeletal remains show a range
of physical attributes (round-headed) suggesting separate migrations of
different populations from Asia and the South Pacific, representing
95 percent of all modern American Indian populations. What of the
other 5 percent?
There are exceptions.
For example, the Siouan family of tribes (Sioux/Ojibwa Indians), the popular red-skinned
tribes having a long-head shape similar to that of early Italic peoples
in Europe. They are thought to be descendants of Canaanites (Phoenicians) who intermarried with Indo-Europeans while migrating across Europe, and subsequently sailing
to North America. They would become the largest group of Native Americans in the United States. Settling along the eastern shores of North America,
and according to tradition, they populated the Carolinas, then migrated
to the regions of Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and eventually Minnesota
and the Dakotas. Many of these tribes had fortified villages similar
to ancient Canaanites (who lived along the coast of the Mediterranean Sea,
including parts of Egypt and the Jordan Valley). Archaeological evidence
shows they constructed towns and cities with small pyramids and vast road
systems throughout the Mississippi Valley. With them came a tradition
that is thought to be a reference to the wives of Noah and his three sons.
Four women are identified as "mothers of origin" whose names (possibly
Canaanite) have been preserved down through the generations (see name chart
below). Additionally, there are striking similarities between the
languages of ancient Egypt and those of the Native Americans that inhabited
the areas around Louisiana about the time of Christ. Epigraphy experts
have stated that the languages of the Attakapa, Tunica and Chitimacha tribes
have affinities with Nile Valley (Egyptian) languages involving certain
words associated with Egyptian trading communities of 2,000 years ago. Scholars
note the Sioux/Ojibwa peoples used pictographs and ideographic writing symbols that also
have similarities with ancient Canaanites.
Many groups
migrated southwest into Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico and eventually Mexico,
establishing the powerful Aztec tribes with their beautiful fortified cities,
integrating with the Mayas (who had been there hundreds of years before,
and thought of the Aztecs as barbarians). Likely there was a mixing
of cultures as they migrated, as there was no conquest of the Maya world
by the Aztecs; that title would be given to the Spaniards in the late 17th
century. The Aztec's traditions and legends are largely ignored by
modern scholars as myths and fables. The Aztecs, according to their
own legends, departed from a region in the north called Chicomoztoc, a
region that is today the areas of Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico.
Later establishing a city known as Aztlan, somewhere in north or northwest
Mexico (now lost), their tribal name Aztec was born. Being
nomadic, they eventually reached the valley of Mexico in the 12th century
A.D. They were known as fearless warriors and pragmatic builders
who raised an enormous city called Tenochtitlan, their capital city (now
Mexico City).
The Aztecs
would later call themselves "Mexica" (where Mexico is derived), and their
language, Nahuatl, was linguistically related to other native language
groups throughout the U.S. southwest and northern Mexico. Linguists
note, for instance, the Shoshoni language in the Utah-Nevada region was
understood by all the tribes from Mexico, without difficulty. Other
related tribes included the Paiute, Hopi, Pima, Yaqui/Apache, Tepehuan,
Kiowas and Mayos. Catholic missionaries in the 1850's established
the fact that all of those peoples were of one language family. While
there are other examples of language similarities, studies of the native
languages of the Americas have shown them to be extremely diverse, representing
nearly two hundred distinct families, some consisting of a single isolated
language.
4Pacific
Islanders have a diverse and unique history. These oceanic peoples
of the South Pacific, whom we know as Polynesians, Maoris, Tahitians, Samoans,
Fijians, Tongans and others, have their roots in southern China.
Prior to the Mongols establishing themselves in southern China, there were
migrations of Negroid peoples from east Africa and the Sahara. A
number of African cultures kept documents and ancient texts, as well as
strong oral history and legends, of migrations to ancient China from Africa.
Mongol groups later migrated into southern China, resulting in a mixing
of cultures. Southern China is thought to have first come into being
out of the mixture of Mongoloids and Negroids. These peoples were
likely driven out by other aggressive Mongoloids. Being master seafarers,
they sailed into Polynesia and the surrounding region, populating the islands
of the South Pacific. The term Hittite
in Cuneiform (the earliest form of writing invented by the Sumerians) appears
as Khittae* representing a once powerful nation from the Far East
known as the Khitai, also in Hebrew as Khettai, and has been
preserved through the centuries in the more familiar term, Cathay.
The Cathay were Mongoloids, considered a part of early Chinese stock.
There are links between the known Hittites and Cathay, for example, their
modes of dress, their shoes with turned-up toes, their manner of doing
their hair in a pigtail, and so forth. Representations show them
to have possessed high cheekbones, and craniologists have observed that
they had common characteristics of Mongoloids.
*Khittae
has, at times, been incorrectly associated with Kittim or Chittim
(Greek Kition, Roman Citium, Jewish Cethimus),
son of Javan, son of Japheth. Kittim is also the Biblical name for modern-day Cyprus.
Javan is the Hebrew word for Greece, appearing five times in the Old Testament.
Interestingly enough, Javan has been incorrectly interpreted to
mean Japan. History distinctly shows Javan to be the ancestor
of the Greeks and other related Mediterranean people groups.
Sin (or Seni),
a brother of Heth, has many occurrences in variant forms in the Far East.
There is one significant feature concerning the likely mode of origin of
Chinese civilization. The place most closely associated by the Chinese
themselves with the origin of their civilization is the capital of Shensi,
namely, Siang-fu (Father Sin). Siang-fu appears in Assyrian
records as Sianu. Today, Siang-fu can be loosely translated,
"Peace to the Western Capital of China." The Chinese have a tradition
that their first king, Fu-hi or Fohi (Chinese Noah), made his appearance
on the Mountains of Chin, was surrounded by a rainbow after the world had
been covered with water, and sacrificed animals to God (corresponding to
the Genesis record). Sin himself was the third generation from Noah,
a circumstance which would provide the right time interval for the formation
of early Chinese culture. In addition, the Miao tribe of southwest
China had a tradition similar to the Genesis account, even before they
met Christian missionaries. According to their tradition, God destroyed
the whole world by a flood because of the wickedness of man, and Nuah (Noah)
the righteous man and his wife, their three sons, Lo Han (Ham), Lo Shen
(Shem), and Jah-hu (Japheth) survived by building a very broad ship and
taking on it pairs of animals.
There is strong
evidence that suggests early Chinese knew of the God of the Bible.
There are accounts described in the "Shu Jing" (Book of History), compiled
by Confucius, where it is recorded that Emperor Shun (ruled from about
2256 B.C. to 2205 B.C. when the first recorded dynasty began) that he
worshiped and sacrificed a bull to "ShangDi." ShangDi literally means
"Heavenly Ruler." Linguists point out that ShangDi, Creator-God of
the Chinese, is the phonetic equivalent to El Shaddai, Creator-God of the
Hebrews. About 700 B.C., the early Zhou pronunciation of ShangDi
was "djanh-tigh" (Zhan-dai). The bull was sacrificed at an annual
ceremony called a "Border Sacrifice," a rite that did not end until 1911
when the last emperor was deposed. Additionally, recitations from
the ancient rite parallel several Bible passages, including the creation
account in Genesis. Scholars who have analyzed the most ancient forms
of these pictographic Chinese writings (graphic symbols called ideograms),
which date from before the time of Moses, have the entire story of creation,
the temptation, the fall of man into sin, and God's remedy for sin in the
animal sacrifices, which pointed to the coming Savior, Jesus Christ.
All the elements of the Genesis narrative are found recorded, and still
in use, in Chinese character-writing. This confirms the idea that
the ancient Chinese incorporated their early knowledge of Genesis into
their written language.
History has
much to say about the descendants of Sin (Seni) who came from the Far East
to trade. They were called Sinæ (Sin) by the Scythians.
Ptolemy, a Greek astronomer, referred to China as the land of Sinim
or Sinæ. Reference to the Sinim in Isaiah 49:12
notes they came "from afar," specifically not from the north and
not from the west. Arabs called China Sin, Chin, Mahachin, Machin.
The Sinæ were spoken of as a people in the remotest parts of
Asia. For the Sinæ, the most important town was Thinæ,
a great trading emporium in western China. The city Thinæ is
now known as Thsin or simply Tin, and it lies in the province of Shensi.
Much of China was ruled by the Sino-Khitan Empire (960-1126 A.D.),
which Beijing became the southern capital. The Sinæ became
independent in western China, their princes reigning there for some 650
years before they finally gained dominion over the whole land.
In the third
century B.C., the dynasty of Tsin became supreme. The word Tsin itself
came to have the meaning of purebred. This word was assumed as a
title by the Manchu Emperors and is believed to have been changed into
the form Tchina. From there the term was brought into Europe as China,
probably from the Ch'in or Qin dynasty (255-206 B.C.). The Greek
word for China is Kina (Latin is Sina). As well, Chinese and surrouding
languages are part of the Sino-Tibetan language family. Years
ago, American newspapers regularly carried headlines with reference to
the conflict between the Chinese and Japanese in which the ancient name
reappeared in its original form, the Sino-Japanese war. Sinology
refers to the study of Chinese history.
There
are many native African tribes which trace themselves back traditionally
to Ham. The Yoruba, who are black skinned, for example, claim to
be descendants of Nimrod, son of Cush, whereas the Libyans, who are much
lighter skinned, are traced back to Phut (Phut is the Hebrew name for Libya).
Ethiopians still trace their ancestry back to Cush. To this day Cush
has many tribal and ethnic designations in Africa and Arabia. The
Egyptians were direct descendants of Mizraim (Mizraim is the Hebrew name
for Egypt). Today, "Misr" is the name Egyptians use to refer to their
country. Ancient Egyptians have been considered the greatest technicians
in all human history. Other African groups trace their roots back
to Ham or one of his descendants. It is therefore suggested that
all of Africa, despite the different shades of color of its native populations,
was initially settled by various members of this one Hamitic family.
In the course of time, some of these people groups had migrations to Australia,
Melanesia, New Guinea and the surrounding region. For example, there
is evidence of similarities in the form of horticulture found in the Sahara
and in Papua New Guinea. Recent studies from archaeology have discovered
there was once extensive trade between east Africa and New Guinea.
The evidence
appears to point consistently in the same direction, supporting that not
only Africa with its black races, but the Far East, the Americas, Australia
and the Oceanic nations with their colored races were all descendants of
Ham. The Hamitic people were the first to reach the far and distant
lands of the world, preparing the way for the future. Their inventions
and discoveries made a significant impact on the world, and provided inspiration
for those to follow.
Japheth.
Also Diphath. Literal meanings are opened, enlarged, fair
or light (father of the Caucasoid/Indo-Europoid, Indo-European, Indo-Germanic,
or Indo-Aryan people groups - Japhethites). Japheth is the
progenitor of seven sons:
(1) Gomer
"complete" (sons were Ashkenaz, Riphath and Togarmah) - also Gamir,
Gommer, Gomeri, Gomeria, Gomery, Goth, Guth, Gutar, Götar, Gadelas,
Galic, Gallic, Galicia, Galica, Galatia, Gael, Galatae, Galatoi, Gaul,
Galls, Goar, Celt, Celtae, Celticae, Kelt, Keltoi, Gimmer, Gimmerai, Gimirra,
Gimirrai, Gimirraya, Kimmer, Kimmeroi, Kimirraa, Kumri, Umbri, Cimmer,
Cimmeria, Cimbri, Cimbris, Crimea, Chomari, Cymric, Cymry, Cymru, Cymbry,
Cumber (Cimmerians, Caledonians, Picts, Milesians, Umbrians, Helvetians,
Celts1,
Galatians, Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Goths, Vandals, Scandinavians, Jutes,
Teutons, Franks, Burgundians, Alemanni, Germans2,
Belgians, Dutch, Luxembourgers, Liechensteiners, Austrians, Swiss, Angles,
Saxons, Britons, English, Cornish, Irish, Welsh, Scots, French, and other
related groups);
(2) Magog
"land of Gog" (sons were Elichanaf, Lubal, Baath, Jobhath and Fathochta)
- also Gog3,
Cog,
Gogh, Gogue, Gogarene, Jagog, Yajuj, Majuj, Juz, Majuz, Agag, Magug, Magogae,
Magogue, Ma-Gogue, Mugogh, Mat Gugi, Gugu, Gyges, Bedwig, Moghef, Magogian,
Massagetae, Getae, Dacae, Sacae, Saka, Scyth, Skythe, Scythi, Scythii,
Scythini, Scythia, Scythae, Sythia, Scythes, Skuthai, Skythai, Cathaia,
Scythia, Skythia, Scynthia, Scynthius, Sythian, Skudra Sclaveni, Samartian,
Sogdian, Slovon, Skodiai, Scotti, Skolot, Skoloti, Scoloti, Skolo-t, Skoth-ai,
Skoth, Skyth, Skuthes, Skuth-a, Slavs, Ishkuzai, Askuza, Askuasa, Alani,
Alans, Alanic, Ulan, Uhlan (Scythians, Scots); also
Rasapu, Rashu,
Rukhs, Rukhs-As, Rhos, Ros, Rosh, Rox, Roxolani, Rhoxolani, Ruskolan, Rosichi,
Rhossi, Rusichi, Rus, Ruska, Rossiya, Rusian (Russians4,
Belarusians, Ukrainians, Chechens, Dagestanis); also Mas-ar, Mas-gar,
Masgar, Mazar, Madj, Madjar, Makr-on, Makar, Makaroi, Merkar, Magor, Magar,
Magyar (Hungarians - also Huns, Hungar, Hunugur, Hurri, Gurri, Onogur,
Ugor, Ungar, Uhor, Venger); Yugoslavians, Finns, Lapps, Estonians,
Siberians, Voguls, Poles, Czechs, Croatians, Bosnians, Montenegrins, Mordvins,
Serbians, Slovenians, Slovakians, Karelians, Komi-Zyrians, Udmurts, Izhorians,
Livonians, Bulgarians, Avars, Tartars, Turks, Colchi, Armenians, Georgians
and other related groups).
(3) Madai
"middle land" (sons were Achon, Zeelo, Chazoni and Lotalso) - also Mada,
Amada, Madae, Madea, Manda, Maday, Media, Madaean, Mata, Matiene, Mitani,
Mitanni, Minni, Megala (Medes5,
Aryans,
Persians, Parsa, Parsees, Achaemenians, Manneans, Caspians, Kassites, Iranians,
Achaemenians, Kurds, East Indians, Romani, Pathans, Hazaras), including
the peoples of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Khazachstan, Turkmenistan,
Uzbekistan, Tajikstan and Kyrgyzstan, and other related groups;
(4) Javan
"miry" (sons were Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim and Dodanim) - also Jevanim,
Iewanim, Iawan, Iawon, Iamanu, Iones, Ionians, Ellas, Ellines, El-li-ness,
Hellas, Hellenes, Yavan, Yavanas, Yawan, Yuban, Yauna, Uinivu, Xuthus (Grecians,
Greeks, Elysians, Spartans, Dorians, Tartessians, Britons6,
Aeolians, Achaeans, Myceneans, Macedonians, Albanians, Carthaginians, Cyprians,
Cypriots, Cretans, Latins, Venetians, Sicanians, Italics, Romans7,
Valentians, Sicilians, Cilicians, Italians, Spaniards, Portugese, other
related groups);
(5) Tubal
"brought" (sons were Ariphi, Kesed and Taari) - also Tabal, Tabali,
Tubalu, Thobal, Thobel (Thobelites, Iberoi, Ibers, Iberians, Ivernians,
Irish8,
Spanish, other related groups), Tbilisi,
Tibarenoi, Tibareni, Tibar, Tibor, Sabir, Sapir, Sabarda, Subar, Subartu,
Tobol, Tobolsk (Cossacks, Samoyeds, Siberians, other related groups);
(6) Meshech
"drawing out" (sons were Dedon, Zaron and Shebashnialso) - Me'shech,
Mes'ek, Meshekh, Meshwesh, Meskhi, Meschera, Mushch, Muschki, Mushki, Mishi,
Muski, Mushku, Musku, Muskeva, Muska, Muskaa, Muskai, Maskali, Machar,
Maskouci, Mazakha, Mazaca, Mtskhetos, Modar-es, Moskhi, Moshkhi, Mosah,
Mosher, Moshch, Moschis, Mosoch, Moschi, Moschian, Moshakian, Mo'skhoi,
Moschoi, Mosochenu, Mosochean, Mossynes, Mosynoeci, Moskva, Moscovy, Moscow
(Muscovites, Latvians, Lithuanians, Romanians, other related groups);
(7) Tiras
"desire" (sons were Benib, Gera, Lupirion and Gilak) - also Tiracian,
Thracian, Thirasian, Thiras, Thuras, Tyritae, Thrasus, Thrace, Trausi,
Tereus, Trecae, Troas, Tros, Troia, Troiae, Troyes, Troi, Troy, Troya,
Trajan, Trojan, Taunrus, Tyras, Tyrsen, Tyrrhena, Illyrian, Ilion, Ilium,
Rasenna, Tursha, Tusci, Tuscany, Etruria, Etruschi, Etruscan, Eturscan,
Euskadi, Euskara (Basque9),
Erul,
Herul, Heruli, Erilar, Vanir, Danir, Daner, Aesar, Aesir, Asir, Svear,
Svea, Svie, Svioner, Svenonian, Urmane, Norge (Leleges, Carians, Pelasgians,
Scandinavians10,
Varangians, Vikings, Swedes, Norwegians, Danes, Icelandics, Baltics, other
related groups).
The Japhetic
people are, in general, the peoples of India and Europe (Indo-European
stock), with which any demographer is familiar11.
Early Celtic
tribes (from Gomer) settled much of the European theater, including present-day
Spain, France, England and Germany, prior to contact with Scythians.
For many centuries France was called Gaul, after the Celtic descendants
of Gomer, whom ceded the territory to Romans and Germanic/Teutonic Franks
(whence France) in the 4th century A.D. Northwest Spain is
called Galicia to this day. Some of the Gomerites migrated further
to what is now called Wales. The Welsh claim their ancestors "first
landed on the Isle of Britain from France, about three hundred years after
the flood." The Celtic language survives intact today mainly in the
two variants of Welsh and Irish/Scottish Gaelic. The Welsh call their
language Gomeraeg (after Gomer). The Celts of today are descendants
of Gomer, and of the blended tribes of Magog and Gomer.
2Present-day
Germanic people groups are descendants of both Japheth and Shem, and there
are several references from recent and ancient history. Recent history
records the descendants of Gomer migrated and settled in the region that
is now northern Europe (Germany and Scandinavia). These tribes became
the Goths, Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Teutons and Burgundians, descendants
of some of the first peoples to migrate to northern Europe from ancient
times—the Askaeni. The Askaeni were descendants of Ashkenaz, son
of Gomer, son of Japheth. When the Askaeni arrived in northern Europe,
they named the land Ascania after themselves, which later translated Scandia,
then Scandinavia. Later in history, we find the Askaeni being referred
to as Sakasenoi, which became Sachsen, and finally Saxon. The Saxons
played an large part in European and English history. Ashkenaz has
been one of the most well preserved names throughout European history.
Semitic peoples
also migrated to central Europe (southern Germany, Austria and Switzerland).
These people were the descendants of Asshur, son of Shem, where Germans
originated. Asshur is well known in history as the father of the
Assyrians. The land of the Assyrians was called "Athur," which became
"Tyr" or "Teiw" by early Germanic peoples. Later, the name linguistically
changes to "Ziu." Germans likely derived their identity and language
from these ancestral names. The earliest known name of the German
language was called "Diutisc," which later becomes Dietsch,
Deutsch or Deutsche (what Germans call themselves today). Deutschland
(land of the Deutsch) could be called Asshurland. The Romans referred
to the Deutschen as Teutons or Teutones. The Teutons
were a tribe of Germans nearly wiped out by Romans in the second century
B.C.
The term "German"
comes from Latin (Roman) sources. The Assyrians occupied a Mesopotamian
city on the lower Tigris River called "Kir" and placed captive slaves there
(also referenced in 2 Kings 16:9, Isaiah 22:5-6, Amos 1:5, 9:7).
The city was populated by the Assyrians for many years, and the inhabitants
became known as "Kir-man." The Assyrians (Kerman) were driven from
their land shortly after their fall about 610 B.C. They migrated
into central Europe where they were called "German" or "Germanni," a general
name used by the Romans to represent all Assyrian tribes. The known
Assyrian tribes were the Khatti (also Hatti, Hessians)—Chatti is still
the Hebrew term for German, and Khatti was also used by the Romans to represent
various Germanic tribes; the Akkadians (Latins called them Quadians); the
Kassites (or Cossaei); and the Almani (or Halmani, Allemani was the Latin
name). Almani or Almain were historical terms for Germans living
in southern Germany.
3One
of the earliest references to Gog is thought to come from Assyrian inscriptions
in the 9th century B.C. referencing "Mat Gugi," meaning "country of the
Gugu." Hesiod, considered the father of Greek didactic poetry and
literature, identified Magog with the Scythians and southern Russia in
the 7th century B.C., written prior the book of Ezekiel. Hesiod likely
derived this from the Colchi people (a Thracian tribe) where, in their
ancient Chaldaic language, described the region of southern Russia as "Gog-chasan"
or "Gog-hasan" (Arabic "Gog-i-hisn") meaning "fortress of Gog" or "Gog's
fort." There are scholars who also suggest that Gog and Magog, as
a region, is where the name "Caucasus" originated. Certain scholars
speculate the name "Caucasus" was derived from "Gog-chasan" which the Greeks
translated as Gogasus or Caucasus. The Caucasus is generally considered
the land between the Black and Caspian seas.
Greek historian
Herodotus, whom historians call "the father of history," mentions in the
5th century B.C. a people living around the Caucasus mountains called "Gargarians."
Greek myth depicted the Gargarians as "Gorgons," which eventually became
Gorgene or Gorgaene. He also wrote extensively about the descendants
of Magog by their Greek name, the Scythians, about 150 years after Ezekiel.
He wrote of "Royal Scythians" who ruled over all other Scythians of Scythia.
Herodotus describes them as living in the territory north of the Black
Sea, and that they terrorized the southern steppes of Russia beginning
in the 10th century B.C. Numerous archaeological discoveries have
confirmed Herodotus' reports in general, and his Scythian accounts in particular.
Flavius Josephus, Jewish and Roman historian, continued with that reference
in the 1st century A.D. when he records that Magogians were called "Scythians"
by the Greeks. Philo, Greek and Jewish philosopher in the 1st century
A.D., also identified Magog with southern Russia.
The Gargarians
show up again in Greek history. Strabo, early 1st century Greek historian,
geographer and philosopher, famous for his 17-volume work Geographica
which presented a descriptive history of people and places from different
regions of the world known to his era, mentions "Gogarene" as a region
in Iberia (present-day Armenia and Georgia). Scholars agree Gogarene
is one of the best preserved names from Gog, which belonged to the Caucasian
Iberian kingdom (present-day Armenia and Georgia) up to the 2nd century
B.C. Aelius Herodianus, Greek and Roman scholar of antiquity, called the
region "Goerene" in the 2nd century A.D. In the 5th century A.D.,
a viceroy in the region of old Armenia called himself Achoucha Gougarqtzi
(Arshusha of Gogarene). In the 6th century A.D., geographer Stephanus
of Byzantium referred to the region as Gogarene, and in the 7th century
the region was known as Gougarq. Today it still exists as Gugark,
a historical region in Armenia. As noted earlier, commentators suggest
Georgia also derived its name from Gogarene, and today the Turkish name
for Georgia is Gurgistan. In recent history, certain Georgians referred
to themselves as "Gogi." Interestingly, a peculiar Skythian people,
who appear at the end of the 4th century A.D., called the Geougen (also
Jou-jan, Jeu-jen, Juan-juan or Jwen-jwen), emerging as a powerful empire
in the region of Tartary (Mongolia). Scholars suggest they were a
mixture of eastern Huns (Skythian) and Tungus (Manchu) peoples, who for
a short time became a Central Asian group of historical importance.
The empire of the Geougen lasted from the end of the 4th century A.D. to
the middle of the 6th century.
Magog's name
is also preserved. Albius Tibullus, Latin poet in the 1st century
B.C., mentions a people living on the River Tanais (present-day River Don)
called "Magini" or "Magotis", whom scholars say were from the colonies
of Magog. The Greeks called the area where the Magini lived along
the Tanais, the "Maeotian marshes" where the river emptied into the Maeotian
Lake (present day Sea of Azov). The marshes served as a checkpoint
to the westward migration of nomad peoples from the steppe of Central Asia.
The area was named after the Maitois or Maeotae people (as the Greeks and
Latins called them) who lived around the Maeotian Lake or Sea. Jerome
(who translated the Latin Vulgate), an Illyrian Christian apologist of
the late 4th and early 5th centuries, affirms "the Jews of this age understood
by Magog the vast and innumerable nations of Scythia, about Mount Caucasus,
and the Palus Maeotis (Latin for Maeotis Sea), and stretching along the
Caspian Sea to India." Scholars suggest that at the early stages
Magogites assimilated with Skythians, thus making up a part of the early
Scythian hordes. In fact, wherever or whenever we see references
to Gog and Magog in name or place, we also see the Skythians. Many of the
mountains peaks in the Caucasian mountains and land areas there retained
the place name "Gog" in medieval European and Armenian maps. Scholars
also regard Gog and Magog as the wild tribes of Central Asia, including
the Scythians, Alans, Parthians, Turks, Tartars, Mongols, and Huns, who
had been making incursions on various kingdoms and empires from very ancient
times. Russian traveller Jacob Reineggs, who visited the Caucasus
five times in the 18th century, left many records of people groups he enountered.
He discovered in the central Caucasus a people called Thiulet, who lived
amidst mountains called Ghef or Gogh. The very highest of these mountains,
lying to the north of their country, they knew by the name of Moghef or
Mugogh. These place names are Gog and Magog derivatives.
4the
Scythians are descended from Ashkenaz, son of Gomer, son of Japheth, and
first appear in Assyrian records as "Askuza" or "Ishkuzai." The Assyrians
tell of the Askuza as being involved in a revolt and pouring in from the
north some time around the beginning of the 7th century B.C., which is
also mentioned in the Old Testament (Jeremiah 51:27). The Askuza
later became the Skythai (Scythians) of Herodotus. According to scholars,
ancient peoples known as the Sarmatians (not to be confused with the Samaritans)
and Alans lived in the area around the Caspian Sea from about 900 B.C.
Sarmatian and Alani tribes were later called Scythians (Slav and Turkic
peoples of today), who were also known as the Rukhs-As, Rashu, Rasapu,
Rhossi, Rosh, Ros, and Rus. There is no debate that they were the
inhabitants of southern Russia, and the existence of the names of rivers,
such as the "Ros," refer to Rus populations. Much later, about 739
A.D., the word Rus appears again in eastern Europe, interestingly, from
a different source. Finnish peoples referred to Swedes as "Ruotsi,"
"Rotsi" or "Rus" in contrast with Slavic peoples, which was derived from
the name of the Swedish maritime district in Uppland, "Roslagen," and its
inhabitants, called "Rodskarlar." Rodskarlar or Rothskarlar meant
"rowers" or "seamen." Those Swedish conquerers (called Varangians
[Vikings] by the Slavs), settled in eastern Europe, adopted the names of
local tribes, integrated with the Slavs, and eventually the word "Rusi,"
"Rhos" or "Rus" came to refer to the inhabitants. Russia means "land
of the Rus." Scholars continue to debate the origin of the word Rus,
which has derived from two sources: the Ruotsi or Rhos,
the Finnish names for the Swedes, and earlier from the Scythians known
as Rashu or Rosh in southern Russia.
5The
Aryans first come into historical view about a thousand years before Christ,
invading India and threatening Babylonia. Historians of old reference
an Aryan chief called Cyaxeres, king of the Medes and Persians. The
Medes and Persians seem to have been tribes of one nation, more or less
united under the rule of Cyaxeres. Elam (son of Shem) is the ancient
name for Persia. Elamites are synonymous with Persians. The
Persians are thus descended from both Elam, the son of Shem, and from Madai,
the son of Japheth. The Medes and Persians had settled in what is
now modern Persia, the Medes in the north, the Persians in the south.
The most notable Persians of today are the Iranians. Interestingly,
the word Iran is a derivative of Aryan. The Medo-Persian
people groups are divided into hundreds of clans, some sedentary and others
nomadic. All speak Indo-European languages, and some groups have
pronounced Mongoloid physical characteristics and cultural traits, derived
from Mongolian invasions and subsequent cultural integration. An
example today would be the Uzbeks of Uzbekistan, and remnant groups living
in Afghanistan and parts of Central Asia.
6The
history of Britain can be traced back to the sons of Japheth. Historical
evidence strongly suggests the first inhabitants of the British isles were
the descendants of Javan (from his sons Elishah and Tarshish), and of Gomer
and Magog. Gomerites are today's modern Welsh. Traditional
Welsh belief is that the descendants of Gomer arrived about three hundred
years after the flood, and the Welsh language was once called Gomeraeg.
The Welsh (Celts) are thought to have created Stonehenge. Additionally,
the descendants of Tarshish (Elishah's brother) apprear to have settled
on the British Isles in various migrations about the same time. Genesis
10:4 refers to Tarshish as those of "the isles of the Gentiles."
The Phoenicians traded silver, iron, tin and lead with them (Ezekiel 27:7,12),
and even mention the incredible stone monuments at Stonehenge. Around
450 B.C., ancient historian Herodotus wrote about shipments of tin coming
from the "Tin Isles" far to the north and west. There is no question
that the British isles, including the northern coast of Spain, were the
seat of the tin trade. King Solomon acquired precious metals from
Tarshish (1 Kings 10:22). English historians assert that British
mines mainly supplied the glorious adornment of Solomon's Temple, and in
those days the mines of southwestern Britain were the source of the world's
supply of tin.
The name Briton
originated from Brutus (a descendant of Elishah), the first king
on Britain's mainland, arriving about 1100 B.C. Two sons of Brutus,
Kamber and Albanactus, are referenced in English prehistory.
From Kamber came Cambaria and the Cambrians (who integrated with
the Gomerites [mostly Celts] and became the present-day Welsh).
The descendants of Albanactus were known as the Albans (or the Albanach
whom the Irish commonly called them). Geographers would later call
the land Albion. The Britons (also Brythons), Cambrians and
Albans populated the British Isles, which later endured multiple invasions,
beginning with successive waves of Celts about 700 B.C. The Celts
(or Gaels) called the land Prydain, their name for Briton.
Those Celts (descendants of Gomer) integrated with the descendants of Elishah
and Tarshish (sons of Javan), creating what some scholars called "a Celticized
aboriginal population" in the British Isles. Some of the invading
people groups were Scythians, descended from Magog, who became known as
the Skoths or Scots. The name for the Celts or Cymru was "Weahlas,"
from Anglo-Saxon origins, meaning "land of foreigners"—Wales. The
Welsh still call themselves Cymru, pronounced "Coomry." Later the
Romans referred to the land as Britannia, invading there about 50
years before the birth of Christ. By the third century A.D., Jutes,
Franks, Picts, Moors, Angles, Saxons and other groups were invading from
surrounding Europe. In the sixth century A.D., Saxons called the
land Kemr (Cymru), and the language Brithenig (Breton). The
Angles eventually conquered Britannia, renaming the territory Angleland,
which became
England. Vikings invaded in the 9th century,
and the Normans (or Northmen—former Danish Vikings) conquered England in
1066. Today, the British isles are settled by the ancestors of those
people groups, which included Gomer and Javan (first inhabitants), plus
Magog (later invasions by various people groups). The date of
the founding of Rome is uncertain, but archaeologists estimate its founding
to around 753 B.C., although it existed as a village or group of villages
long before then. As the Romans steadily developed their city, government
and culture, they imitated the neighboring civilization to the north, the
Etruscans (former Trojans). Romans are sometimes referred to as "Etruscanized
Latins." Roman legend states that Aeneas, founder of the Roman race,
was a prince of Troy who was forced to flee that city at the close of the
Trojan war against Greece. Rome's founder, Romulus, had a latinized
Etruscan name. The Etruscans dominated central Italy, and had already
founded many cities, having arrived some 500 years earlier after leaving
the city of Troy around 1260 B.C. The Etruscans were greatly influenced
by the Greeks, and the Etruscans brought that influence to the city of
Rome. The Romans called Etruscans the Tusci, and Tuscany still
bears the name. The Etruscan language, once thought lost, is still
spoken by the Basques, called Euskara. The first two centuries
of Rome's growth was dominated by the Etruscans. The Romans were
first a subject people of the Etruscans, but the Romans would later be
their conquerors. After many battles with the Etruscans, the city
of Rome identified itself as Latin, eventually integrating the Estruscans
and remaining peoples in the region. Rome became a kingdom, then
an empire.
8The
Irish were likely the first settlers of Great Britain. The Irish
derive their name from Tubal, son of Japheth. Tubal's descendant's
were called by various names, including Tabali (Tibarenoi in Greek),
Tiberani
(from the annals of the Assyrian Kings from which Iberian is derived),
and Thobel from which the Thobelites came who were also called
Iberes according to Jewish historian Flavius Josephus in the 1st
century AD. Scholars note the Iberian and Ivernian peoples were a
Mediterranean race from the east, possibly originating from the area of
present-day Georgia. Tabal, Tubal, Jabal and Jubal were ancient Georgian
tribal designations. The Iberians settled in what is now present-day
Spain or Hispania, the name given by the Romans to the whole of
the Iberian Peninsula. The Ivernians settled in the British Isles,
arriving by sea as early as the 5th century B.C. Later invading Celts
(called Goidels, later Gaels) encountered the tribes of Iverni (also Euerni),
noting they were a small, dark-haired race, harsh-featured and long-headed.
Strabo's early 1st century work Geographia lists the Greek name
of the isle as Iernh. Ptolemy's 2nd century works describe
the pre-Celtic tribes of Iverni as Eraind or Erainn who spoke
a Proto-Celtic language known as Ivernic (Primitive Irish). The Iverni
were called Iouernoi by Greeks, also the Hiberni or Hibernians
by Romans. As their names transliterated through time, Iverni descendants
would call themselves Everiu, and later Eire, from which
the term Irish comes, and the land of Eire, or Ireland was derived.
9The
Etruscans are controversial in history. Their language, culture,
and apparent departure from history are debated amongst scholars.
Descendants of Tiras, the Etruscans did not disappear entirely from history.
Their language and people, though a remnant, are the Basques of today.
Though the Basques mixed with local populations over the past few millennia,
their language didn't die. A number of scholars consider Euskara
(Basque language) the closest living relative to ancient Etruscan.
Euskara is an isolate language, meaning it did not descend from an ancestor
common to any other language family known today. The original Etruscan
language (from ancient Etruscans in northwestern Italy) is thought to be
an extinct isolate language, and there is agreement that the current Euskara
language was already present in Western Europe before the arrival of other
Indo-European languages. Another interesting connection is to Georgian
(language of Georgians in southern Russia), each of which have linguistic
commonalities, prompting scholars to hypothesize Euskara has a relationship
to a lost Eurasian superfamily of languages. This further supports
the suggestion that Etruscans were originally Trojans. After a succession
of wars with the Greeks, around 1260 B.C. thousands of Trojans (speaking
an ancient Thracian language) resettled abroad, which included Trojan warriors
and families who sailed across the Black Sea to the Caucasus region in
southern Russia, and also those who sailed to present-day northwest Italy.
Their descendants, the Basques, would eventually migrate into what is present-day
southeast France and northeast Spain.
DNA (R1b Y-DNA
haplogroup) findings also support a connection between Basques and peoples
of Georgia. As noted earlier, haplogroups (i.e., R1b) are used in
DNA tests for markers that give a broad or regional picture; haplotypes
are one person's results on various DNA tests. Y-DNA is the theoretical
most recent common male-lineage. The greatest concentration of the
R1b haplogroup maps found a heightened incidence in the Basque region of
Spain and in the region east of the Black Sea in southern Russia
(present-day Georgia). Both DNA research and language commonalities
provide a link to the history of the Basques, and thus the Etruscans.
10Scandinavian
predecessors have a unique history. Scholars agree that Scandinavians
(Danes, Norwegians, Swedes) came from early Germanic people groups, including
the Goths, Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Teutons and Burgundians (descendants
of Gomer). Ashkenaz, son of Gomer, is ancestor of those Germanic
peoples. The descendants of Ashkenaz have many historical references.
Known as the Askaeni, they were some of the first peoples to migrate to
northern Europe, naming the land Ascania. Latin writers and Greeks
called the land Scandza or Scandia (now Scandinavia). Roman records
describe a large city on the southern shore of the Caspian Sea (about 350
A.D.) where a chain of mountains begins, and runs eastward along the shore
and beyond it, forming a natural boundary. Those mountains were called
the Ascanimians, the region was called Sakasene (a form of
Ashkenaz), and the dwellers of the city were the Saki. The
Saki tribes had been migrating north to Europe for some time. The
Saki called themselves the Sakasenoi, which we know as the Sachsens
or Saxons. Around 280 A.D. the Romans tell of the employment
of Saxons to guard the eastern British coasts against barbarians.
About 565 A.D., the Saxons battled over territory in the Baltic region
with another powerful people, the Svear. Historical records
indicate that descendants of Tiras also settled in Scandinavia, a people
called the Svear. The Svear are descendants of the first inhabitants
of the ancient city of Troy, a people then known as the Tiracians (also
Thracians, Trajans or Trojans). They were described as a "ruddy and
blue-eyed people." The city of Troy was destroyed around 1260 B.C.
after a succession of wars with the Greeks. Thousands of Trojans
resettled abroad, which included Trojan warriors who sailed across the
Black Sea to the Caucasus region in southern Russia. One of the most
documented of Trojan settlements is along the mouth of the River Don on
the Black Sea. The locals (Scythians) named those Trojan settlers
the "Aes," meaning "Iron" for their superior weaponry. Later, the
inner part of the Black Sea was named after them, called the "Iron Sea"
or "Sea of Aesov" in the local tongue. Today, the name continues
as the "Sea of Azov."
The Aes or
Aesir,
traveled from the Caucasus region to the Baltic Sea in Scandinavia around
90 B.C., which is supported by scholars, modern archaeological evidence,
and DNA. A tribe that migrated with them were the Vanir. The
Aesir clans traded with local Germanic tribes, including the Gutar.
Romans called the Gutar "Goths," the Aesir "Svear"—Swedes, and the Vanir
"Danir/Daner"—Danes. The Svear and Daner populations were described
specifically as taller and fairer (blonde) than other people groups in
the Baltic region. The Svear population flourished, and with the
Goths they formed a powerful military alliance of well-known seafarers.
The Romans noted that Svear people together with the Goths were, from the
3rd century A.D., ravaging the Black Sea, Asia Minor and the Mediterranean,
using the same type of weapons as their Trojan ancestors. The Svear
and Goths dominated the Russian waterways, and by 739 A.D. together they
were called
Varyagans or Varangians (from the Swedish
Vaeringar), according to written records of the Slavs near the Sea
of Azov. Like their ancestors, Scandinavians lived in large communities
where their chieftains would send out maritime warriors to trade and plunder.
Those fierce warriors were called the Vaeringar, which literally
meant "men who offer their service to another master." We later know
them by their popularized name, the Vikings. Further evidence
of Aesir (Asir) settlements in the Baltic region came from their Thracian
language, which not only influenced, but is very close to the Baltic and
Slavic (Balto-Slavic) languages of today. By the 9th century A.D.,
the Svear state had emerged as the major power in Scandinavia. The
Svear, Daner and Goths, along with other Germanic tribes, settled in what
is now present-day Sweden, Norway, Denmark and other parts of the Baltic
region. They were forefathers of the Scandinavians—the descendants
of both Gomer and Tiras. Y-DNA (the most recent common male-lineage)
in Scandinavians was found to be grouped with the Basques mentioned above. The information
presented here is only an interpretation of historical research and Biblical
data. Certain assumptions may not be accurate, and new discoveries
can change group references. While many of the peoples and nations listed
are easily identifiable, many remain obscure. Numerous scholars have attempted
to identify lost or unknown nations with varying degrees of success.
Much of the material is archaic, and there remains considerable ambiguity.
There are some who suggest problems within the Table of Nations when attempting
to correlate specific people groups with modern comparative linguistics. For
example, we know Elamites descended from Shem, yet their language was not Semitic.
Canaanites descended from Ham, yet their language was Semitic. These apparent conflicts are
not conflicts at all. Cultures from ancient times were constantly subject to foreign
migrations and invasions. Conquering powers often imposed their language and culture upon
the defeated; this is what came to pass in Elamite and Canaanite civilizations.
There are many other examples in history. The Israelites, who primarily spoke ancient Hebrew
up until the Babylonian and Persian captivities, would eventually adopt Aramaic, the official
language of the Persian Empire. That resulted in the Jewish Talmud being written in Aramaic.
Aramaic was a language spoken by Jesus. The famous Grecian conqueror, Alexander the Great, subdued Persia,
and soon the Jews adopted Greek as a second language. The result was the New Testament being written
in Greek.
We are all directly related
to either Shem and his wife, Ham and his wife, or Japheth and his wife.
History has long since confirmed abundantly this distribution of mankind, exactly
as the Bible describes. Every human being on earth today is your
cousin, whether first, second or thousandth! Nothing in
the legendary or archaeological history of the ancient world denies the
biblical account of the creation of the world, the entrance of sin and
death, the judgment of Noah's flood, and the rise of the peoples from his
descendants after their dispersal from Babel. Furthermore, the historical
dates used to determine the formation of people groups, nations or kingdoms
does not in any way conflict with the Genesis account, but are well within
the approximate dates for the creation of the world and mankind
about 4000 B.C., the flood of Noah about 2350 B.C., and the dispersal from
Babel around 2100 B.C. Click here
for a genealogical chart from Genesis 10.
This information
is not intended to promote or reflect a particular theology, religious
sect or genealogical group. Don't dismiss the fact that with some
of the Shemites, Hamites and Japhethites there would have been intermarriage
and subsequent people groups. For example, scholars note evidence
that suggests the descendants of Lud (Shemites) migrated north and intermarried
with the Greeks (descendants of Japheth), and were eventually absorbed
in that culture.
The interaction
of all three family contributions is the theme of history. The remarkable
thing is that they all can be substantiated to a degree, often unsuspected
by students of history, up to the present time. The descendants of
Shem, Ham and Japheth are evidenced, not only by Biblical history, but
archeological, anthropological, biological, ethnographical, ethnological,
etymological, geological and secular history. The question is not
one of levels of worth but of uniqueness of contribution, and though differences
exist, not any one group is superior or inferior.
5The
vast aggregate of peoples who are generally classified as Mongoloid, who
settled the Far East, have been a question as to where they fall into the
Table of Nations. Evidence shows they are Hamitic, even though some
have incorrectly reasoned that the Chinese were of Japhetic stock, and
the Japanese were either Japhetic or Semitic. There are two names
which provide clues. Two of Canaan's sons, Heth (Hittites)
and Sin (Sinites), are presumed to be the progenitors of Chinese
and Mongoloid stock. The Hittites were known as the Hatti
or Chatti. In Egyptian monuments the Hittite peoples were
depicted with prominent noses, full lips, high check-bones, hairless faces,
varying skin color from brown to yellowish and reddish, straight black
hair and dark brown eyes. They battled the Egypitan armies of Ramses
II in the 13 century B.C., then disappeared forever from history.
With respect to
the Cathay people of historical reference, it would make sense to suppose
that the remnants of the Hittites, after the destruction of their empire,
traveled towards the east and settled among the Sinites who were relatives,
contributing to their civilization, and thus becoming the ancestors of
the Asian people groups. They are found together in major historical
events that formed the Chinese nation and its people.
Still others migrated throughout the region and beyond, making up present-day Mongoloid
races in Asia and the Americas. The evidence strongly suggests that Ham's grandsons,
Heth (Hittites/Cathay) and Sin (Sinites/China), are the ancestors of Mongoloid peoples.
1The
whole Celtic race has been regarded as descended from Gomer, though history
suggests modern Celts are descended from both Gomer and Magog. Archaeologists
and ethnologists agree that the first Indo-European group to spread across
Europe were Celts. The Irish Celts claim to be to the descendants
of Magog, while the Welsh Celts claim to be to the descendants of Gomer.
Irish chronicles, genealogies, plus an extensive number of manuscripts
which have survived from ancient times, reveal their roots. The Irish
were descendants of Scythians, also known as Magogians, which is strongly
supported by etymological evidence. Archaeological evidence shows
that both the Celts (from Gomer) and Scythians (from Magog) freely shared
and mingled cultures at their earliest stages. Russian and eastern
European excavations plainly reveal the blending of these two groups.
Their geographical locations (what is now eastern Europe, southern Russia
and Asia Minor) were referred to by the Greeks under the name of Celto-Scythae,
which was populated by the Celts to the south and west, and the Scythians
to the north. The ancient Greeks first called the northern peoples
by the general name of Scythae; but when they became acquainted with the
nations in the west, they began to call them by the different names of
Celts, including the Celto-Scythae. Celts and Scythians were considered
essentially the same peoples, based on geography, though many independent
tribes of Celts and Scythians existed. The Latins called them "Galli,"
and the Romans referred to them as "Gauls." Later names used by Greeks
were the Galatai or Galatae, Getae, Celtae and Keltoi. In the third
century before Christ (about 280 B.C.), the Gauls invaded Rome and were
ultimately repelled into Greece, where they migrated into the north-central
part of Asia Minor (Anatolia). Known as fiercely independent peoples,
they conquered the indigenous peoples of that region and established their
own independent kingdom. The land became known as Galatia.
The Apostle Paul wrote his famous epistle to their descendants, the Galatians.
Jewish historian Flavius Josephus wrote that the Galatians or Gauls of
his day (93 A.D.) were previously called Gomerites.
7What
of Romans and pre-Roman peoples? Migrating nomadic peoples came from
across the Alps and across the Adriatic Sea to the east of the Italian
peninsula. They were primarily herdsmen, and were technologically
advanced. They worked bronze, used horses, and had wheeled carts.
They were a war-like people and began to settle the mountainous areas of
the Italian peninsula. Historians called these people Italic,
and they include several ethnic groups: the Sabines, the Umbrians
and the Latins, amongst others. Rome was, in part, founded by these
agrarian Italic peoples living south of the Tiber river. They were
a tribal people, and thus tribal organization dominated Roman society in
both its early and late histories.
11Early
history shows the Japhethites split into two groups. One group settled
in the region of present-day India and Central Asia, and the other group
in the European theater. Indo-European languages originate from those
people groups who migrated throughout western Eurasia (Europe, the Near
East, Anatolia, and the Caucasus). Together they form what is known
as the "Indo-European" family of nations. Both of these divisions
trace their ancestry back to Japheth. For example, early Aryans knew
him as Djapatischta (chief of the race), Greeks referred to Japheth
as Iapetos or Japetos, East Indians called him Jyapeti
or
Pra-Japati, Romans used Ju-Pater or Jupiter, the Saxons
perpetuated his name as Iafeth, subsequently transliterated as Sceaf
(pronounced "sheef" or "shaif"—and recorded his name in their early genealogies
as the son of Noah, the forebear of their various peoples), and the variant
Seskef
was used by early Scandinavians. All of these peoples, we must remember,
were
pagans whose knowledge or even awareness of the book of Genesis had been
lost, or was non-existent.
Endnote:
Listed below
are 19 of the 94 recognized language families of the world, representing
just over 6,900 distinct languages. Approximately 45 percent of the
world's population fall into the Indo-European language family, with 22
percent falling into the Sino-Tibetan language family. Linguists
claim that many of the languages of the world are related by their "proto-language."
Subsequently, all languages can be traced back, in their various linguistic
groups, to a "father tongue," which then evolved multiple times.
However, current knowledge refutes such explanations entirely. For
example, the two largest language families, Indo-European and Sino-Tibetan,
come from their own Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Sino-Tibetan families
exclusively. Many linguists now understand these two proto-languages
were so radically different, they could not have come from a single original
language. The same holds true for the other 92 language families.
Such evidence supports the Bible's claim that the languages given at Babel
were unique and distinct from each other:
Achinese, Afrikaans, Akan, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Assamese, Aymara, Azerbaijani, Balinese, Baluchi, Bambara, Bashkir, Basque, Batak Toba, Baule, Beja, Belorussian, Bemba, Bengali, Beti, Bhili, Bikol, Brahui, Bugis, Bulgarian, Burmese, Buyi, Cantonese, Catalan, Cebuana, Chagga, Chig, Chinese, Chuvash, Croatian, Czech, Dairi, Danish, Dardic, Dimli, Dogri, Dong, Dongola, Dutch, Dyerma, Dyula, Edo, Efik, Ethiopic, English, Esperanto, Estonian, Ewe, Finnish, Fon, French, Frisian, Fula, Fulakunda, Futa, Jalon, Gaelic, Galician, Ganda, Georgian, German, Gilaki, Gogo, Gondi, Greek, Guarani, Gujarati, Gusii, Hadiyya, Hakka, Hani, Hausa, Haya, Hebrew, Hiligaynon, Hindi, Ho, Hungarian, Iban, Icelandic, Igbo, Ijaw, Ilocano, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kabyle, Karo, Kamba, Kannada, Kanuri, Kashmiri, Kazakh, Kenuzi, Khmer, Kikuyu, Kongo, Konkani, Korean, Kurdish, Kyrgyz, Lampung, Lao, Latvian, Leyte, Lingala, Lithuanian, Luba, Luhya, Lulua, Luo, Luri, Luxembourgish, Lwena, Macedonian, Madurese, Makassar, Makua, Malagasy, Malayalam, Malaysian, Malinke, Mandarin, Manx, Marathi, Mazandarani, Mbundu, Meithei, Mende, Meru, Miao, Mien, Migindanaon, Min, Minangkabau, Mongolian, Mordvin, Moré, Nepali, Ngulu, Nknole, Norwegian, Nung, Nupe, Nyamwezi, Nyanja, Occitan, Oriya, Oromo, Panay, Pampangan, Pangasinan, Pashtu, Pattani Malay, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Provençal, Punjabi, Quechua, Rajang, Riff, Romanian, Romany, Ruanda, Rundi, Russian, Samar, Sango, Santali, Sasak, Serbian, Sgaw, Shaba, Shan, Shilha, Shona, Sidamo, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Soga, Somali, Songye, Soninke, Sotho, Spanish, Sudanese, Sukuma, Swahili, Swedish, Sylhetti, Tagalog, Tajiki, Tamazight, Tamil, Tatar, Tausug, Telugu, Temne, Thai, Tho, Thonga, Tibetan, Tigrinya, Tiv, Tonga, Tswana, Tudza, Tulu, Tumbuka, Turkish, Turkmen, Uighur, Ukranian, Urdu, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh, Wolaytta, Wolof, Wu, Xhosa, Yao, Yi, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zande, Zhuang, Zulu. |
Curious about
the names of the wives of Noah, Shem, Japheth and Ham? The Bible
gives us no information on the names of the wives of Noah and his three
sons, although the phrase "Noah's wife" appears five times. The Book
of Jasher (or Book of the Upright), referred to in the Bible in Joshua
and Second Samuel, is considered a reliable ancient Hebrew source for Biblical
patriarchs. The Book of Jasher cites Noah married Naamah, daughter
of Enoch. They brought forth Japheth and Shem. Later, Noah
married Namah, daughter of Lamech, and they brought forth Ham. There
are several extra-Biblical sources of the names of their wives in the chart
below:
|
References:
BOOKS
|
|
|
Copyrights: There aren't any, so you are free to use this information. Sure, I would like to know if you are posting all or part of this article on another website, but my prayer is this will be a blessing to all who read it. Even if this article were copyrighted, the United States Copyright Law, Title 17 of the United States Code, Circular 92, Chapter 1, §107. states: "...the fair use of a copyrighted work...for purposes such as...teaching..., scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright...for nonprofit educational purposes."
Table of Nations
by Tim Osterholm
Updated
02/2010